US District Court for the Middle District of Alabama Civil Rights Cases
Cases 51 - 60 of 1,596
Melton v. Ray (MAG+)
as 1:2023cv00636
Plaintiff:
Elbert Melton, Jr.
Defendant:
Shana Ray
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Melton v. Lowe (MAG+)
as 1:2023cv00638
Plaintiff:
Elbert Melton, Jr.
Defendant:
Albert Lowe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Melton v. Rafferty (MAG+)
as 1:2023cv00641
Plaintiff:
Elbert Melton, Jr.
Defendant:
Bill Rafferty
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Ballard v. State of Alabama (MAG+)
as 2:2023cv00629
Plaintiff:
Mr. Stacey Ballard and Stacey Ballard
Defendant:
State of Alabama
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Daniel v. Alabama Crime Victims Compensation (MAG+)
as 2:2023cv00618
Plaintiff:
Antuane D. Daniel, Sr.
Defendant:
Alabama Crime Victims Compensation
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Daniel v. Montgomery Police Department (MAG+)
as 2:2023cv00619
Plaintiff:
Antuane D. Daniel, Sr.
Defendant:
Montgomery Police Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Daniel v. Empire Properties (MAG+)
as 2:2023cv00617
Plaintiff:
Antuane D. Daniel, Sr.
Defendant:
Empire Properties
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Pimenta
as 2:2023cv00612
Plaintiff:
Pedro Da Silva Pimenta
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Pimenta et al v. Thornton et al
as 2:2023cv00613
Plaintiff:
Pedro Da Silva Pimenta, Heather Staples and Pedro Miguel Da Silva Pimenta
Defendant:
City of Eclectic, Charles Thornton and Charles T. Thornton
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Mulder v. Girling et al (MAG +)
as 2:2023cv00606
Plaintiff:
Julius Littleton Mulder
Defendant:
Dr. Girling, The County of Elmore, Warden Jackson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
