US District Court for the Western District of Arkansas Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 61 - 70 of 3,349
McCutcheon v. Lupinacci et al
as 3:2024cv03003
Plaintiff:
Gene Edward McCutcheon
Defendant:
Jailer Kim Lupinacci and Jail Administrator Hettie Parker
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Murray v. Ables et al
as 6:2024cv06001
Plaintiff:
Jarvis Murray
Defendant:
Nurse Sissy Ables and Wellpath LLC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Knapp v. Arkansas Department of Corrections et al
as 4:2023cv04118
Plaintiff:
Anthony Charles Knapp
Defendant:
Arkansas Department of Corrections, Southwest Arkansas Community Correction and Barbara Oquinn
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bowman v. Express Mobile Radiology
as 6:2023cv06142
Plaintiff:
Christopher Bowman
Defendant:
Express Mobile Radiology
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Herndon v. Byers et al
as 6:2023cv06140
Plaintiff:
John Elwain Herndon
Defendant:
Warden Jared Byers, Lt. Montgomery and Sgt. Sutton
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Baker v. Parker et al
as 3:2023cv03053
Plaintiff:
Dylan Jay Baker
Defendant:
Hattie Parker, Jim Henry and Kimberly Lupinacci
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Davis v. Janske
as 6:2023cv06139
Plaintiff:
Tyrone Davis
Defendant:
Clay Janske
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Toney v. Lingo
as 6:2023cv06135
Plaintiff:
Javon Toney
Defendant:
David Lingo
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Balentine v. Stukey
as 6:2023cv06137
Plaintiff:
Mark Lee Balentine
Defendant:
Dr. Ronald Stukey
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Herrington v. Thomas et al
as 6:2023cv06134
Plaintiff:
Robert Lane Herrington
Defendant:
Sheriff Neal Thomas, Jail Admin #1 Russ Carmack, Jail Admin #2 Brett Lane and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
