US District Court for the District of Connecticut
Cases 11 - 20 of 43,348
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00815
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Job Discrimination (Race)
Berrios v. Quiros
as 3:2024cv00803
Petitioner:
Edwin Eddie Berrios
Respondent:
Angel Quiros
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Saxon v. Connecticut et al
as 3:2024cv00807
Plaintiff:
Robert Saxon
Defendant:
State of Connecticut, Department of Corrections, A. Quiros and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Valentin v. Osborn Correctional
as 3:2024cv00806
Plaintiff:
Jose Valentin
Defendant:
Osborn Correctional
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Carmona v. Maryellen et al
as 3:2024cv00814
Plaintiff:
Alfonso Carmona
Defendant:
Sliya Maryellen, Matthew J Pina, Joel V Ferreira and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Drake v. Breitling USA Inc. et al
as 3:2024cv00819
Plaintiff:
Eric Drake
Defendant:
Breitling USA Inc., Costco Wholesale Corporation, Costco Wholesale Membership, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Hines et al v. Damhas et al
as 3:2024cv00816
Plaintiff:
Marquese Hines, Shameka Hines and Telly Hines
Defendant:
Damhas, Earl Given, 915 Lafayette Blv Room 400 06604 and others
Markham v. Owusu et al
as 3:2024cv00805
Plaintiff:
James Markham
Defendant:
George Owusu and Sambenny Logistics Limited
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00798
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Reese v. State of Connecticut
as 3:2024cv00801
Petitioner:
Reginald J. Reese, Jr.
Respondent:
State of Connecticut
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
