US District Court for the District of Connecticut
Cases 31 - 40 of 43,386
Montes v. O'Malley
as 3:2024cv00825
Plaintiff:
Elizabeth Latoya Montes
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Interested Party:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Harmon v. Semple
as 3:2024cv00839
Plaintiff:
Kurtis Morel Harmon
Defendant:
Scot Semple
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Greene v. Liberty Bank et al
as 3:2024cv00831
Plaintiff:
Jill Greene
Defendant:
Liberty Bank, Ford Motor Credit Company, LLC, State of Connecticut, Department of Revenue Servicess and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Notice of Removal
Bottom Line Driven, LLC et al v. Quinn et al
as 3:2024cv00827
Plaintiff:
Bottom Line Driven, LLC and Joseph DiRaffaele
Defendant:
Michael Quinn and Vanguard Dealer Services, LLC
Seniw v. Greater Bridgeport Transit
as 3:2024cv00828
Plaintiff:
Bohdan George Seniw
Defendant:
Greater Bridgeport Transit
Gupte v. Albertus Magnus College
as 3:2024cv00835
Plaintiff:
Pradeep B. Gupte
Defendant:
Albertus Magnus College
Whittaker v. USA
as 3:2024cv00833
Petitioner:
Chandler B. Whittaker
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
GAN Capital LLC v. Greenwave Technology Solutions, Inc. et al
as 3:2024cv00822
Plaintiff:
GAN Capital LLC
Defendant:
Greenwave Technology Solutions, Inc., Empire Services Inc., Empire Staffing LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Contract Dispute
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00823
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Employment Discrimination
Jean-Marie v. Popkin et al
as 3:2024cv00821
Plaintiff:
Christopher Jean-Marie
Defendant:
Dean Popkin, John Doe, Blawie and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
