US District Court for the Southern District of Georgia
Cases 61 - 70 of 21,638
Enewton Design, LLC v. Walker Pharmacy & Gifts, Inc.
as 6:2024cv00018
Plaintiff:
Enewton Design, LLC
Defendant:
Walker Pharmacy & Gifts, Inc. doing business as Walker Boutique
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1051 Trademark Infringement
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2024cv00017
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Weems v. Telfair State Prison et al
as 3:2024cv00029
Plaintiff:
Cetery Lamar Weems
Defendant:
Telfair State Prison and Ware State Prison
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Harris v. Brannon et al
as 2:2024cv00056
Plaintiff:
Tremar Harris
Defendant:
Daydan Brannon, Cannon Mcleod and Ansley Fennell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Martin v. Chambers
as 3:2024cv00028
Petitioner:
John William Martin
Respondent:
Warden Brian Chambers
Not Yet Classified:
Attorney General State of Georgia (Notice Only)
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Bennett v. Perry et al
as 1:2024cv00046
Plaintiff:
Danny Bennett
Defendant:
J. Kevin Perry, Tyrone Oliver, C. Anderson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Black v. TA Operating LLC
as 4:2024cv00075
Plaintiff:
Linda Black
Defendant:
TA Operating LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Evans v. State of Georgia
as 1:2024cv00045
Petitioner:
Quint Lavert Evans
Respondent:
State of Georgia
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Sifuenter v. State of Georgia
as 5:2024cv00024
Plaintiff:
Gerardo Roel Sifuentes
Defendant:
State of Georgia and Odum
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Berkley Assurance Company v. SEA Truck Service, LLC et al
as 4:2024cv00074
Plaintiff:
Berkley Assurance Company
Defendant:
SEA Truck Service, LLC and Eric Pinault
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity of citizenship
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
