US District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri Social Security Cases
Cases 111 - 120 of 1,311
Blankenship v. Saul
as 4:2020cv01887
Plaintiff:
James Blankenship and James Brian Blankenship
Defendant:
Andrew M. Saul
Interested Party:
SSA Office of General Counsel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Harvill-Zangaro v. Saul
as 4:2020cv01884
Defendant:
Andrew M. Saul
Plaintiff:
Lisa F. Harvill-Zangaro
Interested Party:
SSA Office of General Counsel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Hisle v. Saul
as 2:2020cv00086
Plaintiff:
Allen C Hisle and Allen C. Hisle
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security and Andrew M. Saul
Interested Party:
SSA Office of General Counsel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 416
Lett v. Saul
as 1:2020cv00273
Interested Party:
SSA Office of General Counsel
Defendant:
Andrew M. Saul
Plaintiff:
Kellie Marie Lett
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 402
Caldwell v. Saul
as 4:2020cv01848
Interested Party:
SSA Office of General Counsel
Plaintiff:
Paula Y. Caldwell
Defendant:
Andrew M. Saul
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Barton v. Saul
as 4:2020cv01787
Plaintiff:
Travis Barton
Defendant:
Andrew M. Saul
Interested Party:
SSA Office of General Counsel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 402
Forester v. Saul
as 4:2020cv01783
Plaintiff:
Richard D. Forester
Defendant:
Andrew M. Saul
Interested Party:
SSA Office of General Counsel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Prenger v. Saul
as 4:2020cv01766
Plaintiff:
Thomas M. Prenger
Interested Party:
SSA Office of General Counsel
Defendant:
Andrew M. Saul
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Prenger v. Saul
as 2:2020cv00078
Plaintiff:
Thomas M. Prenger
Interested Party:
SSA Office of General Counsel
Defendant:
Andrew M. Saul
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Donaldson v. Saul
as 2:2020cv00077
Plaintiff:
Nicole S Donaldson
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security and Andrew M. Saul
Interested Party:
SSA Office of General Counsel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 416
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.