US District Court for the Northern District of Ohio Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 31 - 40 of 10,431
United States of America v. Etheridge
as 1:2024cv00705
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Montez Etheridge
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Holloway v. Korecz et al.
as 1:2024cv00670
Plaintiff:
Case Holloway
Defendant:
Police Officer Korecz, Police Officer Young, Police Officer Chesser and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Numann v. Bureau of Prisons
as 4:2024cv00672
Plaintiff:
Gregory Numann
Defendant:
Bureau of Prisons
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Young v. Davis
as 1:2024cv00663
Petitioner:
Kiaran Young
Respondent:
Warden Anthony Davis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Larr v. Mackey
as 1:2024cv00656
Petitioner:
Michael L. Larr
Respondent:
Warden Misty Mackey
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Goins v. Winkel
as 1:2024cv00653
Plaintiff:
Justin Goins
Defendant:
Corporal Winkel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Belton v. Shoop
as 3:2024cv00655
Petitioner:
Anthony Belton
Respondent:
Warden Timothy Shoop
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Rhodes, III v. Wellpath et al.
as 4:2024cv00641
Plaintiff:
EnRico T Rhodes, III
Defendant:
Wellpath, Commissioner D. Ditzler, Jerry Greene and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Peterson et al. v. Willoughby Hills P.D. et al.
as 1:2024cv00631
Plaintiff:
Isaac Peterson and Latoya Brisco
Defendant:
Willoughby Hills P.D., Officer Boepple, Officer Coninenza and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 241 Conspiracy Against Citizen Rights
Lloyd v. Mackey
as 1:2024cv00622
Petitioner:
Cronie Lloyd
Respondent:
Acting Warden Misty Mackey
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
