US District Court for the Southern District of West Virginia Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 61 - 70 of 4,653
Stutler v. Rokosky
as 1:2024cv00047
Petitioner:
Aric Stutler
Respondent:
FCI McDowell and E. Rokosky
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Sanders v. Warden
as 1:2024cv00046
Petitioner:
Tykweyzha L. Sanders
Respondent:
Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Davis v. Warden
as 2:2024cv00043
Petitioner:
De'Maurea Davis, Yae-Yae and Yae Prince
Respondent:
Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Williams v. Marshall et al
as 2:2024cv00044
Plaintiff:
Steven Williams
Defendant:
William Marshall, Jarrod Wilson, Jonathan Frame and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Bain v. Warden
as 5:2024cv00042
Petitioner:
Tamien Derrick Bain
Respondent:
Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Whipple v. Bureau of Prisons
as 5:2024cv00040
Plaintiff:
Robert Z. Whipple, III
Defendant:
Bureau of Prisons
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Carter v. Fayette County Sheriff's Dept. et al
as 2:2023cv00812
Plaintiff:
Frederick Shawnee Carter
Defendant:
Fayette County Sheriff's Dept., Deputy Powell, Deputy Cogar and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Brown v. Holzapfel
as 5:2024cv00035
Petitioner:
Juvan Brown
Respondent:
Warden W. Holzapfel
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Cunningham v. FCI Beckley
as 5:2024cv00031
Plaintiff:
Charles Muhammad Cunningham and Charles Muhammad Abdus-Shaheed Cunningham
Defendant:
FCI Beckley, Kitchen Manager Bailey, John Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Witt v. Warden
as 1:2024cv00030
Petitioner:
Heather Witt
Respondent:
Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
