Contract Cases

Miller Act Cases, Dockets and Filings
Cases filed
Cases 161 - 170 of 6,570
United States of America et al v. D&M Construction, Inc., et al
as 3:2023cv00865
Plaintiff: United States of America and STAY DRY ROOFING, LLC
Defendant: D&M CONSTRUCTION, INC. n/k/a FORESIGHT CONSTRUCTION GROUP, INC., Travelers Casualty and Surety Company of America, BLUE STAR ROOFING, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1352 Miller Act
Type: Contract Miller Act
USA for the use and benefit of TST Insulation,LLC v Federal Insurance Company et al
as 4:2023cv00101
Plaintiff: United States of America for the use and benefit of TST Insulation, LLC d/b/a Retro Insulation and United States of America for the use and benefit of TST Insulation, LLC doing business as Retro Insulation
Defendant: Federal Insurance Company, Travelers Casualty and Surety Company of America, Hartford Fire Insurance Company and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1352 Miller Act
Type: Contract Miller Act
E. Luke Greene Company, Inc. v. All Phase Services, Inc. et al
as 4:2023cv00124
Plaintiff: E. Luke Greene Company, Inc.
Defendant: All Phase Services, Inc. and Argonaut Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Type: Contract Miller Act
Sprinkle Masonry Incorporated v. AECOM Construction, Inc. et al
as 4:2023cv00097
Plaintiff: United States of America for the use and benefit of Sprinkle Masonry Incorporated
Defendant: AECOM Construction, Inc. and Federal Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 40 U.S.C. § 3131 Miller Act
Type: Contract Miller Act
E. Luke Greene Company, Inc. v. All Phase Services, Inc. et al
as 7:2023cv01182
Plaintiff: E. Luke Greene Company, Inc.
Defendant: All Phase Services, Inc. and Argonaut Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Type: Contract Miller Act
United States of America for the use and benefit of Warwick Plumbing and Heating Corporation v. Federal Insurance Company et al
as 4:2023cv00096
Plaintiff: United States of America for the use and benefit of Warwick Plumbing and Heating Corporation doing business as Warwick Mechanical Group
Defendant: Federal Insurance Company, Hartford Fire Insurance Company, Travelers Casualty and Surety Company of America and others
Cause Of Action: 40 U.S.C. § 0270 Miller Act
Type: Contract Miller Act
DMS-BKL Drywall & Interior Systems, Inc. et al v. Liberty Mutual Insurance Company et al
as 1:2023at00589
Plaintiff: DMS-BKL Drywall & Interior Systems, Inc. and The United States of America for the Use and Benefit of DMS-BKL Drywall & Interior Systems, Inc.
Defendant: Liberty Mutual Insurance Company and Solpac Construction, Inc. dba Soltek Pacific Construction Company
Cause Of Action: 40 U.S.C. § 270 Miller Act
Type: Contract Miller Act
The United States of America for the Use and Benefit of DMS-BKL Drywall & Interior Systems, Inc., et al. v. Solpac Construction, Inc., et al. We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2023cv01050
Plaintiff: The United States of America for the Use and Benefit of DMS-BKL Drywall & Interior Systems, Inc. and DMS-BKL Drywall & Interior Systems, Inc.
Defendant: Solpac Construction, Inc. a California Corporation Doing business as Soltek Pacific Construction Company and Liberty Mutual Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 40 U.S.C. § 270 Miller Act
Type: Contract Miller Act
ACW INC v. ASHFORD LEEBCOR ENTERPRISES LLC et al
as 4:2023cv00133
Plaintiff: A.C.W. Inc. and ACW INC
Defendant: Ashford Leebcor Enterprises, LLC, The Cincinnati Insurance Company, ASHFORD LEEBCOR ENTERPRISES LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 40 U.S.C. § 270 Miller Act
Type: Contract Miller Act
United States of America for the use and benefit of ACTS Group, Inc. v. Federal Insurance Company et al
as 4:2023cv00094
Plaintiff: ACTS Group, Inc. and United States of America for the use and benefit of ACTS Group, Inc.
Defendant: Federal Insurance Company and AECOM Construction, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question
Type: Contract Miller Act

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?