Middle District of Alabama Prisoner Petitions Cases

Prison Condition Cases, Dockets and Filings

Cases filed


Cases 21 - 30 of 2,623
Burgess v. Rahming (INMATE 2)
as 2:2017cv00652
Plaintiff: Darrell Burgess
Defendant: Wilcotte Rahming
Cause Of Action: Prisoner Civil Rights
Giles v. Cunningham et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2017cv00647
Plaintiff: Samuel Giles
Defendant: Derrick Cunningham, Major Robinson, Lt. Alexander and others
Cause Of Action: Prisoner Civil Rights
Butts v. Corizon, LLC et al (INMATE 1) We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2017cv00646
Plaintiff: James Charles Butts
Defendant: Corizon, LLC, David Pavlakovic, Bibb County Correctional Facility and others
Cause Of Action: Prisoner Civil Rights
Flagg v. Reid et al (INMATE 1)
as 1:2017cv00642
Plaintiff: Andre D. Flagg
Defendant: Commander Reid, James Brazier, Jason Smith and others
Cause Of Action: Prisoner Civil Rights
Watkins v. Wright et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2017cv00643
Plaintiff: Tanakia Watkins
Defendant: Deidra Wright, Adrienne Givens, Tracy Floyd and others
Cause Of Action: Prisoner Civil Rights
Ellis v. Harrell et al (INMATE 1)
as 2:2017cv00640
Plaintiff: Cory Lamar Ellis
Defendant: Latema Harrell, A. Baldwin , C.O. Kincey
Cause Of Action: Prisoner Civil Rights
Sadler v. Dennis (INMATE 2)
as 2:2017cv00639
Plaintiff: Dante Sadler
Defendant: David Dennis
Cause Of Action: Prisoner Civil Rights
Baisden v. Corizon LLC et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2017cv00627
Plaintiff: Larry Roger Baisden, II
Defendant: Corizon LLC , Dental Nurse
Cause Of Action: Prisoner Civil Rights
Dyal v. Internal Investigations (INMATE 1)
as 2:2017cv00618
Plaintiff: Charles Robert Dyal
Defendant: Agent Louria
Cause Of Action: Prisoner Civil Rights
Knott v. Alabama Department of Corrections (INMATE 1)
as 2:2017cv00607
Plaintiff: Kerry Knott
Defendant: Alabama Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: Prisoner Civil Rights

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?