US District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 81 - 90 of 3,463
Lewis v. Payne
as 4:2023cv01013
Petitioner:
Arron Michael Lewis
Defendant:
M Gutierrez and Dexter Payne
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Henderson v. Payne
as 4:2023cv01005
Plaintiff:
Mark Christian Henderson
Defendant:
Dexter Payne
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Hamilton v. Payne et al
as 4:2023cv01007
Plaintiff:
Gregory L Hamilton
Defendant:
Dexter Payne and James Gibson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Nesdahl v. Garrett
as 2:2023cv00212
Plaintiff:
Timothy Nesdahl
Defendant:
C Garrett
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Faulkner v. Garrett
as 2:2023cv00210
Plaintiff:
Michael Blaine Faulkner
Defendant:
Doe and C Garrett
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Barrett v. Payne
as 4:2023cv00983
Plaintiff:
Joshua M Barrett
Defendant:
Dexter Payne
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
McCoy v. Woods et al
as 4:2023cv00982
Plaintiff:
Terry Lamar McCoy
Defendant:
Lafayette Woods, Jr, Hudson, Tompkins and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Waggoner v. Garrett
as 2:2023cv00206
Plaintiff:
Michael Waggoner
Defendant:
Garrett
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Leach v. Arkansas, State of
as 4:2023cv00951
Plaintiff:
Howard Lee Leach
Defendant:
Arkansas, State of
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jaquez v. Payne
as 4:2023cv00930
Plaintiff:
Thomas Jacquez and Thomas Jaquez
Defendant:
Arkansas, State of and Dexter Payne
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
