US District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 171 - 180 of 2,274
Williams v. Anderson et al
as 2:2023cv00067
Plaintiff:
Vincent D Williams
Defendant:
Nicholas Anderson, Walker and Brent Bradley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Nowlin v. Sylvester
as 4:2023cv00240
Plaintiff:
Norman Nowlin
Defendant:
Kyle Sylvester
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ausler v. Foster et al
as 4:2023cv00244
Plaintiff:
Antonio D Ausler
Defendant:
Harry Foster, Carnahan, Lori Mason and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lane v. Gardner et al
as 3:2023cv00070
Plaintiff:
Richard Lane
Defendant:
Kristy Gardner, BJ Carter and Jack Bell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Nixon v. Richardson et al
as 3:2023cv00068
Plaintiff:
Ronnie Junor Nixon
Defendant:
Cindy Richardson and Jason Letner
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Fortune v. Does
as 2:2023cv00057
Plaintiff:
Daniel Fortune
Defendant:
Does
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Carter v. Arkansas, State of
as 4:2023cv00191
Plaintiff:
Sanders M Carter
Defendant:
Arkansas, State of
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Terry v. Does
as 4:2023cv00169
Plaintiff:
Calvin W Terry, III
Defendant:
Does Faulkner County Deputy(ies), Sergeant, and Sheriff, Does Faulkner County Deputy(ies), Sergeant, and Sheriff; Mayflower Chief of Police, Tye Everett and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hicks v. Phillips County Sheriff Department et al
as 2:2023cv00042
Plaintiff:
Jason Hicks
Defendant:
Phillips County Sheriff Department, Jeremy Bramlett and Neil Byrd
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Walker v. Payne
as 4:2023cv00153
Plaintiff:
Khiry Cordell Shiheem Walker
Defendant:
Dexter Payne
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
