US District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 191 - 200 of 2,274
Randle v. Whatley et al
as 4:2023cv00116
Plaintiff:
Leodis Randle
Defendant:
Karen D Whatley and Eric Higgins
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Tyler v. Thyer et al
as 3:2023cv00040
Plaintiff:
Cody Tyler
Defendant:
Cindy Thyer, Charles Roberts and Does Poinsett County Court System
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Norris v. Forrest City Police Department et al
as 2:2023cv00027
Plaintiff:
Jaqwan Norris
Defendant:
Forrest City Police Department and Carl Cannon
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Brown v. Laddner et al
as 3:2023cv00036
Plaintiff:
Rickey Brown
Defendant:
Cody Laddner, Taylor Igleheart, Jason Allen and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Johnson v. Washington et al
as 3:2023cv00033
Plaintiff:
James Johnson
Defendant:
Patrick Washington, Ronnie William and Christion Dean
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mosley v. Doe
as 2:2023cv00014
Plaintiff:
Tommy Mosley
Defendant:
Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Martin v. Moiser et al
as 4:2023cv00048
Plaintiff:
Deshon Ladon Martin
Defendant:
Bruce Moiser, Tallort, Davidson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Allen v. Philhours et al
as 2:2023cv00009
Plaintiff:
Tyrone Allen
Defendant:
Randy Philhours, Mike Snell and Addie Burk
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hurst v. Dillion et al
as 4:2023cv00044
Plaintiff:
Deontre Rashad Hurst
Defendant:
Clayton Dillion and Taylor
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Campbell v. Hunter et al
as 3:2023cv00010
Plaintiff:
Jacob Campbell
Defendant:
Ron Hunter, Tasha Jamerson and Trumann Police Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
