US District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 61 - 70 of 2,266
Smith v. Martin et al
as 4:2023cv01087
Plaintiff:
Joseph J Smith
Defendant:
Melanie Martin, Cynthia Smith, Janick Tate and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Russell v. Martin et al
as 4:2023cv01088
Plaintiff:
Derrick L Russell
Defendant:
Melanie Martin, Cynthia Smith, Janick Tate and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Langguth v. Langguth et al
as 4:2023cv01082
Plaintiff:
Gerhard Langguth
Defendant:
Alfred Langguth, Wilburn Wilson Shrader and Shrams and Rebeca Wilburn
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Arnold v. Weaver et al
as 3:2023cv00232
Plaintiff:
Matthew Arnold and Matthew Christopher Arnold
Defendant:
Tim Weaver and Eric Bray
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Arnold v. Bray
as 3:2023cv00234
Plaintiff:
Matthew Arnold and Matthew Christopher Arnold
Defendant:
Eric Bray
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Arnold v. Fulton County Sheriff's Office
as 3:2023cv00235
Plaintiff:
Matthew Arnold and Matthew Christopher Arnold
Defendant:
Fulton County Sheriff's Office
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McBee v. Battle et al
as 4:2023cv01055
Plaintiff:
Tatyana Lashelle McBee
Defendant:
Corwin Battle, John Rhone, Blake Eudy and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Dayberry v. Long et al
as 4:2023cv01023
Plaintiff:
Jim Wayne Dayberry
Defendant:
Brandon Long, Jennifer Osborne, Justin Meeks and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Johnson v. Doe
as 2:2023cv00214
Plaintiff:
John Ellis Johnson
Defendant:
Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hamilton v. Higgins et al
as 4:2023cv01000
Plaintiff:
Kevin Lynn Hamilton, Jr
Defendant:
Eric Higgins, Elizabeth Kanopsic and Ron Davis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
