US District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 51 - 60 of 2,267
McCurley v. Eastman et al
as 4:2023cv01173
Plaintiff:
Jesse L McCurley
Defendant:
Sam Eastman and Lee D Short
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Callaway v. Johnson et al
as 4:2023cv01171
Plaintiff:
Coby James Callaway
Defendant:
Leon Johnson, Kaleb Hatton and Sherri Flynn
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Medlock v. Arkansas, State of et al
as 4:2023cv01157
Plaintiff:
Randy Medlock
Defendant:
Arkansas, State of, Crittenden County Sheriff Department and Garrett
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Keesee v. Eddleman
as 4:2023cv01158
Plaintiff:
Zachery Scott Keesee
Defendant:
Travis L Eddleman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hale v. Morrilton, City of et al
as 4:2023cv01153
Plaintiff:
Quentin Hale
Defendant:
Morrilton, City of and Nathan Watkins
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Zamora v. Jones et al
as 4:2023cv01151
Plaintiff:
Armando Zamora
Defendant:
Shane Jones and Nick Gault
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Harvey v. Payne
as 4:2023cv01149
Plaintiff:
Derek Harvey
Defendant:
Dexter Payne
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Newton v. Huccubee-Sanders et al
as 4:2023cv01146
Plaintiff:
George Newton
Defendant:
Sarah Huccubee-Sanders and Dexter Payne
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Newsome v. Federal Bureau of Investigation et al
as 4:2023cv01133
Plaintiff:
LaVita Newsome
Defendant:
Federal Bureau of Investigation and Internal Revenue Service
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Newsome v. Pulaski County School District et al
as 4:2023cv01132
Plaintiff:
LaVita Newsome
Defendant:
Pulaski County School District and Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
