US District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 21 - 30 of 10,188
Nard v. Does
as 2:2024cv00071
Plaintiff:
Joseph Antoine C Nard
Defendant:
Does
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rundel v. Turn Key Medical et al
as 3:2024cv00062
Plaintiff:
Robert Rundel
Defendant:
Turn Key Medical and Bailey Crocker
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hurt v. Snyder et al
as 3:2024cv00060
Plaintiff:
Joshua Keith Hurt
Defendant:
Brad Snyder and Ashten Jackson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Shorty v. Pulaski County Regional Detention Facility et al
as 4:2024cv00306
Plaintiff:
Joshua Lynn Shorty, Jr
Defendant:
Pulaski County Regional Detention Center and Department of Human Services
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Barefield v. Conway et al
as 4:2024cv00292
Plaintiff:
Keya Deonte Barefield
Defendant:
Cynthia Conway, Joseph Mahoney, William Straughn and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Liscomb v. Randel et al
as 4:2024cv00296
Plaintiff:
Michael Allen Liscomb
Defendant:
Kenyen Randel, Antonio D Johnson, Jr, Tod Ball and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Elmore v. Robinson et al
as 4:2024cv00290
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey Elmore
Defendant:
Jane Robinson, Lindsy Hill, Francis Ray and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ribardi v. Does
as 2:2024cv00067
Plaintiff:
Jared Ribardi
Defendant:
Does
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hill v. WellPath Medical Corporation et al
as 4:2024cv00284
Plaintiff:
Adam Hill
Defendant:
WellPath Medical Corporation, Kent, Rory Griffin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Toth v. Payne et al
as 4:2024cv00285
Plaintiff:
Timothy Allen Toth
Defendant:
Joe Payne and Bolden
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
