Arkansas Civil Rights Cases
Cases 71 - 80 of 3,252
Metro Builders Supply, Inc. et al v. City of Lowell, Arkansas et al
as 5:2023cv05229
Plaintiff:
Metro Builders Supply, Inc. and Metro Builders Supply of Rogers, Inc.
Defendant:
City of Lowell, Arkansas, Chris Moore, Elizabeth Estes and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Williams v. Pulaski, County of et al
as 4:2023cv01169
Plaintiff:
Khakeem Marquis Williams
Defendant:
Pulaski, County of, Eric Higgins, Mark Swaggerty and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Other Civil Rights
Barlow v. US Customs Border Patrol et al
as 4:2023cv01152
Plaintiff:
Clinton C Barlow
Defendant:
US Customs Border Patrol, Dundalk Marine Terminal, US Customs and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Other Civil Rights
Jones v. Arkansas Highway Police
as 4:2023cv01144
Plaintiff:
Matthew Jones
Defendant:
Arkansas Highway Police
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Other Civil Rights
Smith v. Consumer Financial Protection Bureau et al
as 5:2023cv05223
Plaintiff:
Vanessa Carol Lynn Smith
Defendant:
Consumer Financial Protection Bureau and Wealth Management/Arvest
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Crowson v. Doe et al
as 4:2023cv04112
Plaintiff:
Russell Crowson
Defendant:
John Doe, Michael Kramm and City of Texarkana, Arkansas
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ford v. Car Nation, Inc.
as 6:2023cv06128
Plaintiff:
Jennifer Ford
Defendant:
Car Nation, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Stevens v. Dennis
as 4:2023cv01134
Plaintiff:
Jeremy Wayne Stevens
Defendant:
Jodi Raines Dennis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Other Civil Rights
White v. Higgins et al
as 4:2023cv01125
Plaintiff:
Edward White
Defendant:
Eric Higgins, Randy Morgan, Holmes and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Other Civil Rights
Stanley v. Gaudreau
as 4:2023cv01121
Plaintiff:
Marsha Stanley
Defendant:
Daniel Gaudreau
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Other Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
