California Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 81 - 90 of 55,794
(HC) Saenz v. Campbell
as 1:2024cv00395
Petitioner:
Robert G. Saenz
Respondent:
T. Campbell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
(HC) Papazian v. B.M. Trate
as 1:2024cv00392
Petitioner:
James Michael Papazian
Respondent:
B.M. Trate
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
(HC) Grayson v. Sacramento County Main Jail
as 2:2024cv00996
Petitioner:
Ziquan S. Grayson
Respondent:
Sacramento County Main Jail
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
(HC)Saldivar v. Superior Court of California, Fresno County
as 1:2024cv00393
Petitioner:
Rusty Lee Saldivar
Respondent:
Superior Court of California, Fresno County
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
(HC) Fawcett v. Warden
as 1:2024cv00382
Petitioner:
Mark Fawcett
Respondent:
Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Pina v. Santa Clara County Superior Court
as 3:2024cv01976
Plaintiff:
Andrew Jonathan Pina
Defendant:
Santa Clara County Superior Court
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Oseguera v. Corpus
as 3:2024cv02000
Petitioner:
Daniel Oseguera
Respondent:
Christina Corpus
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
(HC) Taylor v. Smith
as 2:2024cv00982
Petitioner:
Robert Taylor
Respondent:
Stephen Smith
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
(HC) Iseli v. Lynch
as 2:2024cv00980
Petitioner:
Branden Willie Iseli
Respondent:
Jeff Lynch
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
(HC) Christensen v. Unknown
as 2:2024cv00979
Petitioner:
Chad Andre Christensen
Respondent:
Unknown
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
