US District Court for the District of Connecticut
Cases 1 - 10 of 44,490
DeMiero v. Digiday Media
as 3:2024cv01936
Defendant:
Digiday Media
Plaintiff:
William Joseph DeMiero
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Libel,Assault,Slander
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv01937
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451 Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv01939
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act
MATHINE v. Medguard Alert, Inc.
as 3:2024cv01940
Plaintiff:
JOHN MATHINE
Defendant:
Medguard Alert, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Walker v. Semple et al
as 3:2024cv01933
Defendant:
James Dzurenda, Scott Semple, Kevin Roy and others
Plaintiff:
Antonio Walker
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lovelace v. Semple et al
as 3:2024cv01934
Defendant:
Kevin Roy, Sullivan, Gero and others
Plaintiff:
Devon Lovelace
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Broadcast Music, Inc. et al v. Caf @ 350 LLC et al
as 3:2024cv01941
Defendant:
Caf @ 350 LLC doing business as Stormy's and Julia Kish Curcio
Plaintiff:
Southfield Road Music, Hydroponic Music, E. O. Smith Music and others
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
Gonzalez Ruiz v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 3:2024cv01935
Plaintiff:
Max C. Gonzalez Ruiz
Interested Party:
Social Security Administration
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 0405 dc Review of SSA Decision SSDC - Concurrent Title II and Title XVI Claims
Strobert v. Semple et al
as 3:2024cv01928
Defendant:
Carol Cepelak, Gero, Scott Semple and others
Plaintiff:
Anthony Strobert
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
