US District Court for the District of Connecticut
Cases 41 - 50 of 43,289
N.V. Labs, Inc. v. Piney Lake Capital Management LP
as 3:2024mc00046
Plaintiff:
N.V. Labs, Inc. doing business as Reforma Group
Defendant:
Piney Lake Capital Management LP
Cowit et al v. Ricola USA Inc.
as 3:2024cv00734
Plaintiff:
Philip Cowit and Matthew Rhoades
Defendant:
Ricola USA Inc.
Cause Of Action: 31 U.S.C. § 3731 Fraud
Casimir v. Department of State
as 3:2024cv00733
Plaintiff:
Chilene Casimir
Defendant:
Department of State
Cornish v. Town of Bloomfield et al
as 3:2024cv00736
Plaintiff:
ORane M. Cornish, Jr.
Defendant:
Town of Bloomfield, Jalisa X. Cuevas, Matthew T. Suplee and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Fuentes v. Wal-Mart, Inc. et al
as 3:2024cv00712
Plaintiff:
Wanda Fuentes
Defendant:
Wal-Mart, Inc. and Wal-Mart Stores Limited Partnership
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Shackleford v. Pirro & Church, LLC et al
as 3:2024cv00716
Plaintiff:
Dave Shackleford
Defendant:
Pirro & Church, LLC, Olia M. Yelner and Carolina Osorio-Ruiz
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Shawe v. Consolidated School District of New Britain et al
as 3:2024cv00719
Plaintiff:
Winsome E. Shawe
Defendant:
New Britain Consolidated School District and Gina Cavallo
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00720
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621 Job Discrimination (Age)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00723
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act
Johnson v. State of Connecticut et al
as 3:2024cv00728
Plaintiff:
Gregory Johnson
Defendant:
State of Connecticut, Cheyanne Clark, Mark Shepherd and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
