US District Court for the Northern District of Florida
Cases 71 - 80 of 429,311
WASHINGTON v. WATKINS et al
as 3:2024cv00149
Plaintiff:
MARLO WASHINGTON
Defendant:
WATKINS, T FRAZURE, J BURCH and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
DAVIS v. QUINN et al
as 3:2024cv00150
Plaintiff:
DIONTE JERMAINE DAVIS and CHRISTOPHER HORTEN
Defendant:
R QUINN, C HORTEN, K EMMIT and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
COLVILLE v. CHESTNUT et al
as 3:2024cv00148
Plaintiff:
JACOB MONROE COLVILLE
Defendant:
T CHESTNUT and ESCAMBIA COUNTY COMMISSION
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
COVERT v. SOUTHEASTERN CONCRETE PUMPING INC et al
as 1:2024cv00060
Plaintiff:
VICTOR COVERT
Defendant:
SOUTHEASTERN CONCRETE PUMPING, INC. and FRANK STANKUNAS
THOMAS v. MILLER et al
as 4:2024cv00162
Plaintiff:
MARIO M THOMAS
Defendant:
JAMES WILLIAM MILLER, SHAWN SWAIN and DAWN A HART
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
WOOD v. STATE OF FLORIDA
as 4:2024cv00163
Plaintiff:
CHARITY NOELLE WOOD
Defendant:
STATE OF FLORIDA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
DDD WAREHOUSE, LLC v. RICHARDSON et al
as 3:2024cv00146
Plaintiff:
DDD WAREHOUSE, LLC
Defendant:
TIMOTHY RICHARDSON and 29 LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Notice of Removal
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00159
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
YOUNG v. WCTV NEWS CHANNEL
as 4:2024cv00161
Plaintiff:
DA'VHON YOUNG
Defendant:
WCTV NEWS CHANNEL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
EVANS v. LEBLANC et al
as 4:2024cv00160
Plaintiff:
PARIS DEMETRIUS EVANS
Defendant:
BOB LEBLANC, GARY E MOLEK, HEATHER DANIELLE PASTOOR and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
