Guam Contract Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 56
Gateway Network Connections, LLC. et al v. Matulich
as 1:2022cv00024
Plaintiff:
Gateway Network Connections, LLC. and Asia Connectivity Elements, Inc.
Defendant:
Russell Matulich
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Declaratory Judgement
Axe Murderer Tours Guam, Inc. v. Johnson Outdoors, Inc.
as 1:2022cv00005
Plaintiff:
Axe Murderer Tours Guam, Inc.
Defendant:
Johnson Outdoors, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
International Sports Partners PTE. LTD. v. Guam Football Association
as 1:2021cv00023
Plaintiff:
International Sports Partners PTE. LTD.,
Defendant:
Guam Football Association
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Guam Waterworks Authority v. Badger Meter, Inc.
as 1:2020cv00032
Defendant:
Doe Insurance Companies 1, 2 and 3 and Badger Meter, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Guam Waterworks Authority
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Marks v. Hellmont et al
as 1:2019cv00142
Plaintiff:
Robert Jay Marks
Defendant:
Dr Deider Neuper, Lars Filip Hellmont and Dr. Deider Neuper
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Habeck v. Ojets USA LLC
as 1:2019cv00099
Defendant:
Ojets USA LLC
Plaintiff:
Terry Habeck
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Propacific Builder Corp. v. Perma-Liner Industries, LLC
as 1:2018cv00041
Defendant:
Perma-Liner Industries, LLC
Plaintiff:
Propacific Builder Corp.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
First Hawaiian Bank v. Office Creativity, Inc. et al
as 1:2018cv00033
Defendant:
Office Creativity, Inc. and Jesse S. Lujan
Plaintiff:
First Hawaiian Bank
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
First Hawaiian Bank v. Pacific Composites, Inc. et al
as 1:2018cv00028
Defendant:
Christophear D. Young, Pacific Composites, Inc. and Amanda W.F. Young
Plaintiff:
First Hawaiian Bank
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Rahmani v. Longley
as 1:2018cv00011
Plaintiff:
Kia Rahmani
Defendant:
Charles Longley and Ellen Longley
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 635
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
