US District Court for the District of Idaho Labor Cases
Cases 31 - 40 of 163
Scalia v. Katsilometes
as 4:2020cv00371
Plaintiff:
Eugene Scalia
Defendant:
George W Katsilometes
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
DiCianni, et al. v. Nez Perce County, et al.
as 3:2020cv00253
Plaintiff:
Grant DiCianni and Amanda DiCianni
Defendant:
Don Beck, Nez Perce County, Doug Havens and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Fair Labor Standards
Bymun v. City of Kimberly
as 1:2020cv00171
Defendant:
City of Kimberly
Plaintiff:
Roxanne Bymun
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
McKenna v. Logo Carriers, LLC
as 1:2020cv00156
Defendant:
Logo Carriers, LLC
Plaintiff:
Tammy L. McKenna
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 704
Berglund v. Canyon County et al
as 1:2019cv00396
Defendant:
Bryan F Taylor, Tom Dale, Leslie Van Beek and others
Plaintiff:
Chris Burglund and Chris Berglund
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 203
Johnson, et al. v. Canyon County, Idaho, et al.
as 1:2019cv00364
Defendant:
Pam White, Canyon County, Idaho, Leslie Van Beek and others
Plaintiff:
Linda Ellis, Rene Whitneck, Tracy Johnson and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 203
Thompson v. Community Connections Incorporated
as 2:2019cv00300
Plaintiff:
Dorinda J Thompson
Defendant:
Community Connections Incorporated
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 704
Kissack v. Aramark Campus, LLC et al
as 1:2019cv00184
Plaintiff:
Brandi Kissack
Defendant:
Aramark FHC Campus Services, LLC, Aramark Food & Supply Services Group, Inc., Aramark Campus, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Omar v. Idaho Diner, LLC et al
as 4:2019cv00004
Defendant:
ADM LLC, Thomas Hersch, Idaho Diner, LLC and others
Plaintiff:
Yusuf Omar
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Arriwite v. SME Steel Contractors, Inc.
as 4:2018cv00543
Defendant:
SME Steel Contractors, Inc. and SME John Does I-V
Plaintiff:
Daniel C. Arriwite
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
