Indiana Civil Rights Cases
Cases 121 - 130 of 18,396
Treadwell v. Walkerton Police Department
as 3:2024cv00226
Plaintiff:
Tanishia Treadwell
Defendant:
Walkerton Police Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00473
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00472
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00052
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 The Americans with Disabilities Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00460
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451 Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00461
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Leed et al v. Pitney et al
as 3:2024cv00219
Plaintiff:
Cody Leed, Kimberlie Mollette and Aiden Manges
Defendant:
Matthew Pitney, Matthew Hassell, Marshall County and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Cowles v. United States of America et al
as 3:2024cv00213
Plaintiff:
Kenneth D Cowles, III
Defendant:
United States of America, Federal Bureau of Investigation, Indiana State of and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Jones v. Majestic Care Center et al
as 1:2024cv00111
Plaintiff:
Teddie B Jones and Teddie Jones
Defendant:
Majestic Care Center, David Early, Mike Kerr and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00021
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
