Indiana Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 81 - 90 of 7,612
LIMA v. CARTER et al
as 1:2024cv00598
Plaintiff:
RICHARD ALLEN LIMA
Defendant:
CARTER, TEAH and RUNYON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MANKIN v. VIGO COUNTY SHERIFF DEPARTMENT et al
as 2:2024cv00112
Plaintiff:
GARY MANKIN
Defendant:
VIGO COUNTY SHERIFF DEPARTMENT, FUNKHOUSE and QUALITY CORRECTIONAL CARE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
HARDEN et al v. VIGO COUNTY SHERIFF DEPARTMENT et al
as 2:2024cv00113
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER HARDEN, MARVIN STRONG, TONNY COCKRAIL and others
Defendant:
VIGO COUNTY SHERIFF DEPARTMENT, BILL JOY, TGGS CANTINE SERVICES and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
WARE v. REAGLE
as 1:2024cv00586
Plaintiff:
JOSIAH BENJAMIN WARE
Defendant:
DENNIS REAGLE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
KIRKLAND v. OMBUDSMAN BUREAU et al
as 1:2024cv00588
Plaintiff:
MARTIZE KIRKLAND
Defendant:
OMBUDSMAN BUREAU, CHARLENE A. BURKETT, ENGLISH and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
TOWNSEND v. LOWELL et al
as 2:2024cv00108
Plaintiff:
ANTONIO D. TOWNSEND
Defendant:
LOWELL, NEFF, HELTERBRAND and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
SMITH v. COX et al
as 2:2024cv00109
Plaintiff:
CORY MARTEZ SMITH
Defendant:
C. COX, M. SHEPPARD, J. MEEKS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
SMITH v. ALABI et al
as 1:2024cv00589
Plaintiff:
CADEN LEE SMITH
Defendant:
G. ALABI and JOHN DOE 1
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
NICKELL v. THIBAULT
as 1:2024cv00573
Plaintiff:
PERRY LEE NICKELL
Defendant:
THIBAULT
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
TEAGUE v. MITCHELL et al
as 3:2024cv00065
Plaintiff:
THOMAS T. TEAGUE, SR.
Defendant:
DANNY MITCHELL, DIANE PHEIFFER, I. RANDOLPH and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
