Indiana Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 51 - 60 of 7,612
JACKSON v. I.D.O.C et al
as 2:2024cv00128
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM CLAYTON JACKSON
Defendant:
I.D.O.C, FRANK VANIHEL and WABASH VALLEY CORRECTIONAL FACILITY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
RUTH-BRADLEY v. SIPICH et al
as 1:2024cv00666
Plaintiff:
JOSEPH JAMES RUTH-BRADLEY
Defendant:
CARRIE SIPICH, DERRIK HOBBS, FOSTER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BERRY v. AKANDE et al
as 1:2024cv00667
Plaintiff:
MARQUESE BERRY
Defendant:
AKANDE, JAIL COMMANDER, ADEOJO and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
HOOD v. ODELL
as 1:2024cv00663
Plaintiff:
DERRICK L. HOOD
Defendant:
SAMUEL ODELL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
LINTHICUM v. CENTURION et al
as 1:2024cv00659
Plaintiff:
JONATHAN LINTHICUM
Defendant:
CENTURION and RUNYON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
FINCHER v. HOLCOMB et al
as 2:2024cv00129
Plaintiff:
TRAVON FINCHER
Defendant:
ERIC J. HOLCOMB, CHRISTINA REAGLE, JACK HENDRIX and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
TAYLOR v. REGAL et al
as 2:2024cv00130
Plaintiff:
ALTON LEON TAYLOR
Defendant:
CHRISTINA REGAL, FRANK VANIHEL and ERIC J. HOLCOM
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
ANDERSON v. WASHINGTON COUNTY JAIL, INDIANA
as 1:2024cv00669
Plaintiff:
DEJAUNE L. ANDERSON and PRINCESS CALIFIA HATUN TUPAK BEY II
Defendant:
WASHINGTON COUNTY JAIL, INDIANA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MCCOOL v. KIRKLAND et al
as 2:2024cv00125
Plaintiff:
JEREMY W. MCCOOL
Defendant:
KIRKLAND, BUELNA and PRETORIUS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BALLEW v. KNOX COUNTY JAIL
as 2:2024cv00126
Plaintiff:
QUINTEN WAYNE BALLEW
Defendant:
KNOX COUNTY JAIL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
