US District Court for the Eastern District of Kentucky Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 101 - 110 of 7,539
Hamblin v. USA
as 6:2024cv00017
Petitioner:
Big Tom
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
McClain v. Stacy et al
as 3:2024cv00010
Plaintiff:
Jonathan Robert McClain
Defendant:
Dr. Stacy, Nurse Kim, Teresa and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bailey v. Jones et al
as 0:2024cv00016
Plaintiff:
Ronnie Scott Bailey
Defendant:
Brandon Jones, Nathan Conley and Wesley Coldiron
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McClain v. Losch
as 3:2024cv00008
Plaintiff:
Jonathan Robert McClain
Defendant:
Steve P. Losch
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Galvez v. LeMaster
as 0:2024cv00015
Petitioner:
Vincente Galvez
Respondent:
David LeMaster
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Matthews v. USP McCreary
as 6:2024cv00014
Plaintiff:
Louis Matthews
Defendant:
USP McCreary
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Mahaffey v. Bureau of Prison, FMC Lexington et al
as 5:2024cv00038
Plaintiff:
Trontez Mahaffey
Defendant:
Bureau of Prison, FMC Lexington, City of Lexington, Warden David Paul and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Harris v. USA
as 6:2024cv00013
Petitioner:
Zachary Harris
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Beam et al v. Sergeant Covington Police Department
as 2:2024cv00020
Plaintiff:
Gary Wayne Beam and Angela Clara Wagner
Defendant:
Sergeant Covington Police Department and Blue Color Officer
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Vanwinkle v. Sgt Sizemore et al
as 5:2024cv00032
Plaintiff:
Donald Vanwinkle
Defendant:
Sgt Sizemore, C.O. Roberts, R.N. Combs and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
