U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Kentucky
Cases 41 - 50 of 32,034
In Re Attorney Admission for Lauren Kathleen Miller
as 5:2025aa00028
Unknown:
Attorney Admission Application
Cause Of Action: Civil Miscellaneous Case
Bailey v. Rowan County Detention Center et al
as 0:2025cv00034
Plaintiff:
Ronnie Scott Bailey
Defendant:
Rowan County Detention Center and Rowan County Kentucky
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Conner v. City of Covington et al
as 2:2025cv00042
Plaintiff:
Damien Conner
Defendant:
City of Covington, Colonel Brian Valenti, Doug Ullrich and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
King v. USA
as 2:2025cv00041
Petitioner:
Kenneth Paul King
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Bennett v. Bureau of Prisons et al
as 5:2025cv00083
Petitioner:
Dawn Bennett
Respondent:
David Paul, Warden, William W. Lathop and Colette Peters
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Burton v SSA
as 7:2025cv00013
Plaintiff:
Miranda Burton
Defendant:
Commissioner of SSA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
In Re Attorney Admission for Kenny L. Saffles
as 5:2025aa00027
Unknown:
Attorney Admission Application
Cause Of Action: Civil Miscellaneous Case
McNay et al v. Draw Symons Company
as 2:2025cv00039
Plaintiff:
Shane David McNay and Kasey McNay
Defendant:
Draw Symons Company doing business as Exotic Ammo and Ordinance Group
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Williams v. United States
as 5:2025cv00081
Petitioner:
Bruce Lowell Williams
Respondent:
United States
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Banks v. Paul, Warden
as 5:2025cv00082
Petitioner:
Gregory L. Banks
Respondent:
David Paul, Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
