US District Court for the District of Maine Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 161 - 170 of 1,257
LARSEN v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 1:2021cv00156
Plaintiff:
RICHARD A LARSEN, III
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ADAMS v. USA
as 2:2021cv00139
Petitioner:
ERICK LEVAR ADAMS
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
WILLIAMS v. FREY et al
as 2:2021cv00111
Defendant:
MATTHEW WILLIAMS, AARON M FREY and JOHN D PELLETIER
Plaintiff:
ABIJAH WILLIAMS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
KILMARTIN v. USA
as 1:2021cv00100
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
SIDNEY P KILMARTIN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
KINNEY v. AROOSTOOK COUNTY JAIL et al
as 1:2021cv00093
Defendant:
RON OLDFEILD, CORRECTIONS OFFICER THORN, ALISON OUELETT and others
Plaintiff:
RICHARD MORGAN KINNEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BOULIER v. PENOBSCOT COUNTY JAIL et al
as 1:2021cv00080
Defendant:
PENOBSCOT COUNTY SHERIFF, PENOBSCOT COUNTY JAIL, TROY MORTON and others
Plaintiff:
WAYNE E BOULIER, JR
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
JAMES v. MORIN et al
as 1:2021cv00076
Defendant:
CAPT PATRICK COCKTEN, CAPT BRUCE DOMENICH, CHAD COOPER and others
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL JOHN JAMES
Not Classified By Court:
MAINE ATTORNEY GENERAL - PRISONER CASES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
COMMEAU v. MAGNUSSON
as 1:2021cv00074
Petitioner:
MICHAEL COMMEAU
Not Classified By Court:
MAINE ATTORNEY GENERAL - HABEAS CASES
Respondent:
MATTHEW MAGNUSSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
PAQUETTE v. DEPT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 1:2021cv00064
Defendant:
DEPT OF CORRECTIONS, MICHAEL DOWNS and CARPI DIEM
Plaintiff:
DAVID PAQUETTE
Not Classified By Court:
MAINE ATTORNEY GENERAL - PRISONER CASES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
COMMEAU v. MAGNUSSON
as 1:2021cv00055
Not Classified By Court:
MAINE ATTORNEY GENERAL - HABEAS CASES
Petitioner:
MICHAEL EDWARD COMMEAU
Respondent:
MATTHEW MAGNUSSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
