US District Court for the District of Maine Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 221 - 230 of 1,256
DOUCETTE et al v. AROOSTOOK COUNTY JAIL et al
as 1:2020cv00008
Defendant:
GRAIG CLOSSEY, AROOSTOOK COUNTY JAIL and DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
Plaintiff:
HARLEY D SIMON, COLBY DOUCETTE and HERBERT M ADAMS, IV
Not Classified By Court:
MAINE ATTORNEY GENERAL - PRISONER CASES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
GEORGE v. YORK COUNTY JAIL et al
as 2:2019cv00569
Defendant:
WILLIAM KING, YORK COUNTY JAIL and OFFICER CUMMERS
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM R GEORGE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ADAMS v. MAGNUSSON et al
as 1:2019cv00547
Defendant:
RANDALL LIBERTY, MATTHEW MAGNUSSON, THOMAS AVERILL and others
Plaintiff:
JON R ADAMS
Not Classified By Court:
MAINE ATTORNEY GENERAL - PRISONER CASES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
HOLMES v. LANCASTER et al
as 1:2019cv00548
Defendant:
MICHAEL O MITCHELL, DALE P LANCASTER, TEISHA CATES and others
Plaintiff:
BRIAN R HOLMES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
PENMAN v. MORIN
as 1:2019cv00545
Petitioner:
ROGER PENMAN
Respondent:
JEFFREY MORIN
Not Classified By Court:
MAINE ATTORNEY GENERAL - HABEAS CASES
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
DOUCETTE v. AROOSTOOK COUNTY JAIL et al
as 1:2019cv00534
Defendant:
SARGEANT MORRISON, SARGEANT SCHOOLS, SARGEANT WRIGHT and others
Plaintiff:
COLBY L DOUCETTE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
CAYFORD v. USA
as 1:2019cv00530
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
VANCE CAYFORD
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
RAYMOND v. GRANT
as 1:2019cv00529
Defendant:
WILLIAM GRANT
Plaintiff:
COREY MARC RAYMOND
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MCCURDY v. STATE OF MAINE
as 2:2019cv00511
Petitioner:
PRESCOTT MCCURDY
Respondent:
STATE OF MAINE
Not Yet Classified:
MAINE ATTORNEY GENERAL - HABEAS CASES
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
HALL v. AROOSTOOK COUNTY JAIL et al
as 1:2019cv00503
Plaintiff:
RILEY JEAN HALL
Defendant:
AROOSTOOK COUNTY JAIL and WILLIAM GRANT
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
