US District Court for the District of Massachusetts Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 11 - 20 of 6,490
Harner v. Theriault
as 1:2024cv12385
Plaintiff:
Timothy Harner
Defendant:
Officer C Theriault
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Piard v. Silvia
as 1:2024cv12368
Plaintiff:
Joseph Piard
Defendant:
Kate Silvia
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jennings v.Narrison
as 1:2024cv12374
Plaintiff:
Edward Vincent Jennings, Jr.
Defendant:
Adam Narrison, Dr Zeizal, Mental Health Expert and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Middleton v. Alves
as 1:2024cv12334
Defendant:
Nelson Alves
Plaintiff:
Alexis Middleton
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Cordero v. Bowers
as 1:2024cv12338
Petitioner:
Melvin Cordero
Respondent:
Warden Bowers
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv12337
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Schmitt v. Ryan et al
as 1:2024cv12300
Defendant:
Jeffrey J. Gonsalves, Lt Herrick, Mary Ryan and others
Plaintiff:
Joseph P. Schmitt
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jennings v. Narrison et al
as 1:2024cv12292
Defendant:
Dr. Zeizal, Richard Farrell, Adam Narrison and others
Plaintiff:
Edward Vincent Jennings, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hayes v. Federal Bureau of Investigations et al
as 1:2024cv12291
Defendant:
Kristen Steffen, Torhacker, Christopher Wray and others
Plaintiff:
Michael Hayes
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Pinney v. State of Massachusetts
as 1:2024cv12295
Respondent:
State of Massachusetts
Petitioner:
Johnathan Pinney
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
