US District Court for the District of Massachusetts Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 81 - 90 of 6,492
Harrison v. Plymouth County Sheriffs Department et al
as 1:2024cv11347
Plaintiff:
Melik Harrison
Defendant:
Plymouth County Sheriffs Department, Antone Moniz and Lotterhand
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Latham v. Officer Oneill et al
as 1:2024cv11318
Defendant:
Officer Oneill and Legal Mail Officer at Old Colony Correctional Center
Plaintiff:
Lincoln Latham
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv11300
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
IN RE: JONATHAN DONNELL WILLIAMS
as 1:2024cv11274
Plaintiff:
Jonathan Donnell Williams
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Beatty v. Kennedy
as 1:2024cv11284
Petitioner:
Joseph W Beatty
Respondent:
Stephen Kennedy
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
MacDougall v. Jenkins et al
as 1:2024cv11279
Plaintiff:
Mark MacDougall
Defendant:
Shawn P. Jenkins, Stephen Kennedy and Joy Gallant
Latham v. Officer Wyatt et al
as 1:2024cv11310
Plaintiff:
Lincoln Latham
Defendant:
Officer Wyatt and Inmate Canteen Office at Old Colony Correctional Center
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Borker v. Warden Bowers
as 1:2024cv11254
Petitioner:
Vitaly Borker
Respondent:
Warden Bowers
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv40073
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv11244
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
