US District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan Other Statutes Cases
Cases 31 - 40 of 256
Anders v. Benson et al
as 4:2020cv11991
Defendant:
Jennifer Redmond, Cathy M. Garrett, Wayne County Board of Canvassers and others
Plaintiff:
Shane Anders, Leigh Reed-Pratt, Venias Jordan, Jr. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Chancellor v. Geelhood et al
as 2:2020cv11616
Defendant:
City of Detroit, a Municipal entity and Officer Stephen Geelhood
Plaintiff:
Darell Deon Chancellor
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Martinko et al v. Whitmer
as 2:2020cv10931
Plaintiff:
Contender's Tree and Lawn Specialists, Inc., Steve Martinko, Wendy Lackomar and others
Defendant:
Gretchen Whitmer
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Edwards Bey v. Boedecker et al
as 4:2020cv10602
Defendant:
Brian Schaf, Molly Zappitell, Kathryn A. Viviano and others
Plaintiff:
Jernardo Edwards Bey
Taylor v. Eastpointe, City of et al
as 3:2019cv13276
Defendant:
Prosecuting Attorney Eric J. Smith, Macomb County, Eastpointe, City of and others
Plaintiff:
Mr. Conie Taylor and Conie Taylor
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Rose v. Oakland County Treasurer et al
as 2:2019cv13066
Defendant:
Oakland County Treasurer, +City of Southfield and Southfield Neighborhood Revitalization Initiative LLC
Plaintiff:
Sharron Rose
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Abner v. Whitmer et al
as 3:2019cv12471
Defendant:
Governor Gretchen E. Whitmer and Director, MSP Joseph Gasper
Plaintiff:
Will Abner
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Martinez v. Caesar KKK Haine Religieusemen et al
as 2:2019cv11816
Defendant:
Children of Sultan religieusmen, Asillian religieusemen, Haine religeuseman and others
Plaintiff:
Ursula Antonia Martinez
Martinez v. PNC Bank et al
as 2:2019cv11820
Defendant:
PNC Bank and Bank of America
Plaintiff:
Melinda Daniella Martinez
Ingram v. Whitmer et al
as 2:2019cv11791
Plaintiff:
James Bazelle Ingram
Defendant:
Gretchen Whitmer and Joseph Gasper
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
