US District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina Torts - Injury Cases
Cases 11 - 20 of 97
Moore v. Wheeley
as 5:2021cv00439
Plaintiff:
Sebastian X. Moore
Defendant:
Chris Wheeley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Lee et al v. Cumberland County Sheriff's Department
as 5:2021cv00374
Plaintiff:
Shelia Y. Lee and R.K.N.
Defendant:
Cumberland County Sheriff's Department
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2021cv00363
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Mangum v. Oxygen Media, LLC et al
as 5:2021cv00337
Plaintiff:
Crystal Gail Mangum
Defendant:
Oxygen Media, LLC and Jennifer Geisser
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Kordun Express, Inc. et al v. Almasi
as 7:2021cv00123
Plaintiff:
Kordun Express, Inc. and Floyd, Inc.
Defendant:
Laszlo Almasi
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Freeman v. Wood Environment and Infrastructure Solutions, Inc et al
as 4:2021cv00077
Defendant:
John Wood Group, PLC, HKA Enterprises of South Carolina, LLC and Wood Environment and Infrastructure Solutions, Inc
Plaintiff:
Cory Freeman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Case Opened in Error
as 4:2021cv00051
Defendant:
John Wood Group, PLLC and Elizabeth A. Martineau
Plaintiff:
Ronnie D. Suggs
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Suggs v. John Wood Group, PLLC et al
as 4:2021cv00052
Defendant:
John Wood Group, PLLC, Wood Environment and Infrastructure Solution, Inc., Amec Foster Wheeler Kamtech, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Ronnie D. Suggs
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Sandoval v. John Doe No. 1 et al
as 5:2020cv00579
Plaintiff:
Tacho M Sandoval
Defendant:
John Doe No. 1, John Doe No. 3 and John Doe No. 2
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Harr v. WRAL-5 News et al
as 5:2020cv00362
Plaintiff:
Sidney B. Harr
Defendant:
WRAL-5 News and James F. Goodmon
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.