US District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 41 - 50 of 2,302
STANBACK v. STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
as 1:2023cv00690
Petitioner:
ROBERT ANTWAIN STANBACK
Respondent:
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
LEWIS v. GUILFORD COUNTY SHERIFF
as 1:2023cv00699
Petitioner:
HAKEEM LEWIS
Respondent:
GUILFORD COUNTY SHERIFF
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
HERNANDEZ-GONZALEZ v. JONES
as 1:2023cv00659
Petitioner:
ESTEBAN HERNANDEZ-GONZALEZ
Respondent:
TIMOTHY JONES
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
CURRIE v. USA
as 1:2023cv00660
Petitioner:
EMANUEL CURRIE
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
FUTRELL v. SCARANTINO
as 1:2023cv00676
Petitioner:
JULE C. FUTRELL
Respondent:
WARDEN THOMAS SCARANTINO
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
WARREN v. CASSADY
as 1:2023cv00670
Petitioner:
SEAN DEREK WARREN
Respondent:
DAVID CASSADY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
PAUL v. USA
as 1:2023cv00653
Petitioner:
MELVIN RAIMUND PAUL
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
HALLUM v. STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
as 1:2023cv00616
Petitioner:
ANTHONY LAMONT HALLUM
Respondent:
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
HILL v. STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
as 1:2023cv00624
Petitioner:
SIMARON D. HILL
Respondent:
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
WARREN v. WARDEN, DP.S. et al
as 1:2023cv00603
Petitioner:
SEAN DEREK WARREN
Respondent:
WARDEN, DP.S. and D.A.C., STATE OF N.C.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
