US District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 61 - 70 of 2,335
CLAWSON v SUPERINTENDENT, EASTERN CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTE
as 1:2023cv00937
Petitioner:
RANDY CLAWSON
Respondent:
SUPERINTENDENT, EASTERN CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
BLACK v. COOPER
as 1:2023cv00920
Petitioner:
MARTINEZ ORLANDIS BLACK
Respondent:
BILLY COOPER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
SIMMONS v. HODGES
as 1:2023cv00926
Petitioner:
BILLY SIMMONS
Respondent:
BRUCE HODGES
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
MOSBY v. NORTH CAROLINA et al
as 1:2023cv00887
Petitioner:
CHRISTOPHER MOSBY
Respondent:
NORTH CAROLINA, TODD ISHEE and ROY COOPER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
SHARPE v. BUFFALOE
as 1:2023cv00853
Petitioner:
JERRY L. SHARPE
Respondent:
EDDIE BUFFALOE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
HUCKABEE v. USA
as 1:2023cv00841
Petitioner:
CHRISTOPHER LEE HUCKABEE
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
HILL v. BUFFALO
as 1:2023cv00804
Petitioner:
SIMARON D. HILL
Respondent:
EDDIE BUFFALO
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
HARRIS v. ISHEE et al
as 1:2023cv00803
Petitioner:
DAVID ANTHONY HARRIS
Respondent:
TODD E. ISHEE and ROY COOPER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
GRIZZEL v. THE STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
as 1:2023cv00789
Petitioner:
NYAMBER GRIZZEL
Respondent:
THE STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
THOMAS v. BUFFALOE
as 1:2023cv00786
Petitioner:
DALVECCIO T. THOMAS
Respondent:
EDDIE BUFFALOE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
