U.S. District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 11 - 20 of 1,821
BUIE v. VIRGIL et al
as 1:2024cv01083
Defendant:
RODERICK C. VIRGIL and CPL. AUSTIN
Plaintiff:
TOBORIS YANTON BUIE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
WALLS v. CITY OF GREENSBORO
as 1:2024cv01074
Plaintiff:
BOBBIE F. WALLS, JR.
Defendant:
CITY OF GREENSBORO, DET. J.C. PAYNE, DET. M.P. O'HAL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MCDOUGALD v. MCGILL
as 1:2024cv01090
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM O'NEILL MCDOUGALD
Defendant:
DAVID MCGILL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
WARD v. CABARRUS COUNTY DETENTION CENTER
as 1:2024cv01092
Defendant:
CABARRUS COUNTY DETENTION CENTER
Plaintiff:
LISA CAROL WARD
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
WALKER v. DAVIE MEDICAL CENTER HOSPITAL et al
as 1:2024cv01093
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER TERAN WALKER
Defendant:
DAVIE MEDICAL CENTER HOSPITAL and ATRIUM HEALTH WAKE FOREST BAPTIST CORPORATION MEDICAL CENTER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
WALKER v. U.S. MARSHALS
as 1:2024cv01076
Defendant:
U.S. MARSHALS
Plaintiff:
CHARLES A. WALKER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Prisoner Bivens Action
HOLMAN v. USA
as 1:2024cv00974
Defendant:
USA
Plaintiff:
QUENTON DAMON HOLMAN
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 3114 Motion for Return of Seized Property
TYLER v. CITY OF WINSTON SALEM et al
as 1:2024cv00931
Defendant:
JOSHUA GENTILE, STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA, COUNTY OF FORSYTH and others
Plaintiff:
XAVAR TYLER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
SIMERSON v. SIMMONS et al
as 1:2024cv00917
Defendant:
AD PORTER, R. RAMSEY, WA HOWELL and others
Plaintiff:
TERRY SIMERSON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
GAUSE v. COVINGTON et al
as 1:2024cv00856
Plaintiff:
WALTER T. GAUSE
Defendant:
MED STAFF, FNU BARNES, RONALD COVINGTON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
