U.S. District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 41 - 50 of 1,829
SMART v. PAYTEL COMMUNICATIONS
as 1:2024cv00586
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL TREVOR SMART
Defendant:
PAYTEL COMMUNICATIONS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
RUTLEDGE v. RUTLEDGE-CHAMBERS et al
as 1:2024cv00520
Defendant:
BILLY HALL, JR., CHARLOTTE, N.C., NEURALINK and others
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER R. RUTLEDGE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Prisoner Bivens Action
WILLIAMS v. AULD et al
as 1:2024cv00503
Defendant:
DOES and MAGISTRATE JUDGE L. PATRICK AULD
Plaintiff:
JAY WILLIAMS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Prisoner Bivens Action
HAIRSTON v. THE UNITED STATES
as 1:2024cv00504
Defendant:
THE UNITED STATES
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL JIWAN HAIRSTON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
BRITT v. GREGG et al
as 1:2024cv00487
Defendant:
JASON KEITH, CHRISTOPHER BAILEY, GREGORY BOONE and others
Plaintiff:
ASHLEY DESEIRAY BRITT
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
MCCANTS v. HARRISON et al
as 1:2024cv00434
Plaintiff:
TRAVUS MCCANTS
Defendant:
FNU LNU, FNU WOODARD, CHUM HARRISON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
WILLIAMS v. USA et al
as 1:2024cv00445
Defendant:
USA and TEXAS, STATE OF
Plaintiff:
JAY WILLIAMS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Prisoner Bivens Action
BROWN v. NOYES EDGE et al
as 1:2024cv00429
Defendant:
OFFICER #2 T.H. REECE and OFFICER #1 J.P. NOYES EDGE
Plaintiff:
RODNEY BROWN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
WOODBERRY v. MICHAEL et al
as 1:2024cv00231
Plaintiff:
MANDRAIL JAMAR WOODBERRY
Defendant:
JUDGE MICHAEL, JOHN BANDLE, M. ODOM and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
WILSON v. DAVIDSON COUNTY SHERIFF'S OFFICE et al
as 1:2024cv00219
Plaintiff:
SUSAN WILSON
Defendant:
DAVIDSON COUNTY SHERIFF'S OFFICE, DAVIDSON COUNTY, RICHIE T. SIMMONS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
