US District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 101 - 110 of 1,768
CAPORASSO v. BARNES et al
as 1:2023cv00825
Plaintiff:
COSMO THOMAS CAPORASSO
Defendant:
FNU BARNES, FNU RANSOM and FNU SAMPSON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
SIMMONS v. ALAMANCE COUNTY
as 1:2023cv00828
Plaintiff:
DUSHEW SIMMONS
Defendant:
ALAMANCE COUNTY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
JANDREW v. CORIGAN et al
as 1:2023cv00800
Plaintiff:
JOHN P. JANDREW
Defendant:
DOCTOR CORIGAN, MEDICAL DIRECTOR, DOE DISCOVERY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MOORE v. DIVISON OF PRISON DEPARTMENT OF ADULT CORRECTION et al
as 1:2023cv00798
Plaintiff:
ALEX MOORE
Defendant:
DIVISON OF PRISON DEPARTMENT OF ADULT CORRECTION, STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA, JAMAAL MCQUEEN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
FRAZIER v. NCDPS OFFICIALS
as 1:2023cv00792
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL L. FRAZIER
Defendant:
NCDPS OFFICIALS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
THOMAS v. DIAL
as 1:2023cv00782
Plaintiff:
DALVECCIO T. THOMAS
Defendant:
SARGEANT DIAL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MURPHY v. ROCKINGHAM COUNTY et al
as 1:2023cv00767
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL LAVERNE MURPHY
Defendant:
ROCKINGHAM COUNTY, SAM PAGE, OFFICER LUCAS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
HAIRSTON v. NAPHCARE
as 1:2023cv00769
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL JIWAN HAIRSTON
Defendant:
NAPHCARE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
CARTER v. DOE
as 1:2023cv00768
Plaintiff:
KEITH CARTER
Defendant:
W-S POLICE OFFICER JOHN DOE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
THOMAS v. SMITH et al
as 1:2023cv00770
Plaintiff:
DALVECCIO TREMAINE THOMAS
Defendant:
SMITH, T. DAVIS and PETRELLI
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
