North Carolina Civil Rights Cases
Cases 91 - 100 of 11,217
Elabanjo v. Griffith et al
as 5:2024cv00155
Plaintiff:
Samantha Elabanjo
Defendant:
B. W. Griffith and Lawrence Capps
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
McKoy v. City of Raleigh et al
as 5:2024cv00154
Plaintiff:
Ronald McKoy
Defendant:
City of Raleigh, Raleigh Police Department and Tanner C. Goss
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Hemphill v. Charlotte Mecklenburg Board of Education et al
as 3:2024cv00286
Plaintiff:
Corey Hemphill
Defendant:
Charlotte Mecklenburg Board of Education, Christopher Bernard and Christopher K. Bernard
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00193
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2003 Job Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00280
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621 Job Discrimination (Age)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2024cv00142
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
JONES v. DEJOY
as 1:2024cv00184
Plaintiff:
KIMBERLY JONES
Defendant:
LOUIS DEJOY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
FREEMAN v. KIM et al
as 1:2024cv00204
Plaintiff:
DWAYNE E. FREEMAN
Defendant:
SGT. KIM, SGT. LAURA and LUETENANT KNIGHT
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Caulder v. Carolina Beach Police Department et al
as 7:2024cv00155
Plaintiff:
Christopher Caulder
Defendant:
Carolina Beach Police Department, Brandon Smith, Crofton Stephenson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Warren v. Braswell et al
as 7:2024cv00233
Plaintiff:
RICHARD D. WARREN, JR.
Defendant:
TYLER BRASWELL, North Carolina Department of Insurance and John Doe
Respondent:
New Hanover County
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
