North Carolina Civil Rights Cases
Cases 141 - 150 of 11,217
Washington v. Roof Above Day Services Center
as 3:2024cv00169
Plaintiff:
Roosevelt Washington
Defendant:
Roof Above Day Services Center
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2024cv00085
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00165
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2024cv00080
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 The Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2024cv00081
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451 Employment Discrimination
Asanov v. Sukeena et al
as 5:2024cv00082
Plaintiff:
Alexander N. Asanov
Defendant:
Belinda K. Sukeena, Tanya A. Plekan, Julie L. Bell and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 7:2024cv00099
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451 Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2024cv00079
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Public Accommodations)
DOUGLAS v. CRISCO et al
as 1:2024cv00101
Plaintiff:
MARIA DOUGLAS
Defendant:
KYLE CRISCO and CVS PHARMACY, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Oxendine v. Urban Inc. et al
as 3:2024cv00162
Plaintiff:
Christopher M. Oxendine
Defendant:
Urban Inc. and John Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
