North Carolina Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 91 - 100 of 7,992
Johnson v. State of North Carolina
as 5:2024hc02034
Petitioner:
Bradley Johnson
Respondent:
State of North Carolina
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Eads v. Rich
as 5:2024hc02031
Petitioner:
Christopher J. Eads
Respondent:
Warden David Rich
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Roberts v. Heckard
as 5:2024hc02032
Petitioner:
Joseph Orlando Roberts
Respondent:
Katrina Heckard
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Porter v. Kelly
as 5:2024hc02030
Petitioner:
Wayne Porter
Respondent:
L.B. Kelly
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Atkins v. Henderson County Detention Center
as 5:2024hc02028
Petitioner:
Mattie Atkins
Respondent:
Henderson County Detention Center
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Al-Shabazz v. Scarantino
as 5:2024hc02027
Petitioner:
Malik Al-Shabazz
Respondent:
Warden Scarantino
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Atkins v. Henderson County Detention Center
as 5:2024hc02029
Petitioner:
Mattie Atkins
Respondent:
Henderson County Detention Center
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
JOINER v. FORSYTH COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT
as 1:2024cv00094
Petitioner:
RAYMOND DAKIM HARRIS JOINER
Respondent:
FORSYTH COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Hartley v. State of North Carolina et al
as 5:2023hc02280
Petitioner:
Drew C. Hartley
Respondent:
State of North Carolina and Sheriff of Onslow County
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Belvin v. Scarantino
as 5:2024hc02026
Petitioner:
Frederic Belvin
Respondent:
Warden Scarantino
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
