North Carolina Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 101 - 110 of 7,986
Martinez-Rodriguez v. United States of America
as 5:2024hc02021
Petitioner:
Gencis Martinez-Rodriguez
Respondent:
United States of America
Defendant:
L.B. Kelly
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Faulk v. State of North Carolina
as 5:2024hc02020
Petitioner:
James Issac Faulk
Respondent:
State of North Carolina
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Noonsab v. Ishee
as 5:2024hc02018
Plaintiff:
Somchai Noonsab
Defendant:
Commissioner of Pris Todd Ishee
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Santos v. Unknown Respondent
as 5:2024hc02019
Petitioner:
Andreuris Santos
Respondent:
Unknown Respondent
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Dean v. Priest
as 5:2024hc02017
Petitioner:
Torean McKyle Dean
Respondent:
Pazavar Priest
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
CHAMBERS v. GUILFORD COUNTY SHERIFF
as 1:2024cv00051
Petitioner:
DWIGHT CHAMBERS
Respondent:
GUILFORD COUNTY SHERIFF
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Dixon v. State of North Carolina
as 5:2024hc02014
Petitioner:
David Keandre Dixon
Respondent:
State of North Carolina
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Fessel v. Heckard
as 5:2024hc02015
Petitioner:
Greg Fessel
Respondent:
Warden Katina Heckard
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Al-Shabazz v. Scarantino
as 5:2024hc02013
Petitioner:
Malik Al-Shabazz
Respondent:
Warden Scarantino
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Rutledge v. State of North Carolina
as 5:2024cv00020
Petitioner:
Christopher R. Rutledge
Respondent:
State of North Carolina and The State of North Carolina
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
