North Dakota Civil Rights Cases
Cases 191 - 200 of 605
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2018cv00192
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2018cv00172
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2018cv00171
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2018cv00169
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Olafson v. Anderson et al
as 3:2018cv00168
Defendant:
Dr. Rosalie Etherington, Maggie D. Anderson, Melanie Flynn and others
Plaintiff:
Andrew James Olafson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hunter et al v. City of Jamestown Police Department et al
as 3:2018cv00154
Defendant:
Lt. Opt, City of Jamestown Police Department, City of Devils Lake Police Department and others
Plaintiff:
Civil Rights Center of South Dakota and Michael Hunter
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Rivera et al v. Cloverdale Foods Company
as 1:2018cv00145
Plaintiff:
Kidani Montalvo Andino, Carlos Huertes, Junito Arroyo and others
Defendant:
Cloverdale Foods Company
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hamre v. Sprout et al
as 3:2018cv00138
Defendant:
Officer Sprout, Ryan Nelson, Robert Matheson and others
Plaintiff:
John Phillip Hamre
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2018cv00125
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Olagoke v. Surviving Members of Management Deluxe Corp. Bensonville, Illinois in 1980-1981 Personally Liable
as 1:2018cv00126
Plaintiff:
Olasupo Olagoke
Defendant:
Surviving Members of Management Deluxe Corp. Bensonville, Illinois in 1980-1981 Personally Liable
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
