US District Court for the Northern District of Ohio Prisoner Petitions Cases

General Cases, Dockets and Filings
Cases filed
Cases 21 - 30 of 5,198
Lewis v. State of Ohio, et al
as 1:2023cv02252
Petitioner: Rebeccah Lewis
Defendant: State of Ohio
Respondent: Warden Erin Maldonado
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Chappell v. McConahay
as 4:2023cv02235
Petitioner: Ronald Chappell
Respondent: Warden Tim McConahay
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Sands v. May
as 1:2023cv02222
Petitioner: Joseph A. Sands
Respondent: Warden Harold May
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Stewart v. May
as 1:2023cv02215
Petitioner: Larry D. Stewart
Respondent: Warden Harold May
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Nycklass v. Healy We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 4:2023cv02166
Petitioner: Windsor Nycklass
Respondent: Warden I. Healy
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Orozco v. Healy
as 4:2023cv02151
Petitioner: Jorge Orozco and Garlobo Orozco
Respondent: Warden I. Healy
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Brooks v. Forshey
as 1:2023cv02123
Petitioner: Demondray Brooks
Respondent: Warden Jay Forshey
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Ranes v. Wattson
as 3:2023cv02112
Petitioner: David Ranes
Respondent: Warden Thomas Wattson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Rones v. Summit County Sheriff
as 5:2023cv02086
Petitioner: Murry Rones
Respondent: Summit County Sheriff
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Weiss v. Healy
as 4:2023cv02074
Petitioner: Arthur Sandford Weiss
Respondent: I. Healy
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?