U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Ohio Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 21 - 30 of 5,358
Mitchell v. Luneke
as 3:2025cv00608
Petitioner:
Michael Mitchell
Respondent:
Warden Doug Luneke
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Pullen v. Healy
as 4:2025cv00611
Petitioner:
Leon F. Pullen
Respondent:
Warden Ian M. Healy
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Hodges v. Stuff
as 1:2025cv00574
Petitioner:
Javonte L. Hodges
Respondent:
Warden Angela Stuff
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Khan v. Warden, FCI Elkton
as 4:2025cv00554
Petitioner:
Lajbar Lajaward Khan
Respondent:
Warden, FCI Elkton
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Riggall v. Healy
as 4:2025cv00560
Petitioner:
Richard Hilton Riggall
Respondent:
Warden I. Healy
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Gonzalez-Manjarrez v. Mackey
as 1:2025cv00571
Petitioner:
Carlos Gonzalez-Manjarrez
Respondent:
Warden Misty Mackey
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Regla-Araujo v. Warden, FCI Elkton
as 4:2025cv00544
Petitioner:
Jorge Luis Regla-Araujo
Respondent:
Warden, FCI Elkton
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Sylvester v. Stuff
as 1:2025cv00553
Petitioner:
Kareem J. Sylvester
Respondent:
Warden Angela Stuff
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Seiver v. Warden, FCI Elkton
as 4:2025cv00556
Petitioner:
Ronald Seiver
Respondent:
Warden Warden, FCI Elkton
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Armstrong v. United States of America
as 4:2025cv00536
Petitioner:
Tashawn Dwight Armstrong
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
