US District Court for the Northern District of Ohio Prisoner Petitions Cases

General Cases, Dockets and Filings
Cases filed
Cases 11 - 20 of 5,201
Cooper v. Black
as 5:2024cv00025
Petitioner: Keith R. Cooper
Respondent: Warden Kenneth Black
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Clark v. Healy
as 5:2024cv00011
Petitioner: Terry Clark
Respondent: Warden Healy
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Marshall v. Moore
as 1:2024cv00012
Petitioner: Juanito Marshall
Respondent: Warden Rochelle Moore
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Alexander v. Wallace
as 3:2023cv02424
Petitioner: Frank E. Alexander
Respondent: Warden Timothy Wallace
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Searles v. Baldauf
as 3:2023cv02394
Petitioner: Carolyn S. Searles
Respondent: Warden Teri Baldauf
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Alexander v. Healy
as 4:2023cv02384
Petitioner: Desmond Alexander
Respondent: Warden I. Healy
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Johnson v. Black
as 1:2023cv02368
Petitioner: Curtis L. Johnson, Jr.
Respondent: Warden Kenneth Black
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Mohammed Ali v. Moore
as 5:2023cv02332
Petitioner: Juba Mohammed Ali
Respondent: Rochelle Moore
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Mills v. Wallace
as 3:2023cv02284
Petitioner: Shad D. Mills
Respondent: Warden Thomas Wallace
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Flenner v. Forshey
as 4:2023cv02292
Petitioner: Cecil Lee Flenner
Respondent: Warden Jay Forshey
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?