U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Ohio Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 41 - 50 of 5,358
Newberry v. Wainwright
as 1:2025cv00226
Petitioner:
Ronald Newberry
Respondent:
Warden Lyneal Wainwright
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Woodard v. Fender
as 1:2025cv00198
Petitioner:
Richard Woodard
Respondent:
Warden Douglas Fender
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Tingler v. Kelsey et al.
as 3:2025cv00194
Petitioner:
Charles Tingler
Respondent:
Judge Reeve Kelsey and Andrea Cochran
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Lunsford v. Smith
as 1:2025cv00156
Petitioner:
Duane Lunsford
Respondent:
Warden Shelbie Smith
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Smith v. Watson
as 5:2025cv00152
Petitioner:
Prentice Smith
Respondent:
Warden Tom Watson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Davis v. Franklin County Corrections Center II
as 5:2025cv00154
Petitioner:
DaQuan Davis
Respondent:
Warden, Franklin County Corrections Center II and State of Ohio
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Sullivan v. Mackey
as 1:2025cv00140
Petitioner:
John Paul Sullivan
Respondent:
Warden Misty Mackey
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Mallory v. Watson
as 1:2025cv00142
Petitioner:
Victor L. Mallory, Jr.
Respondent:
Warden Thomas Watson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Cameron v. Stuff
as 1:2025cv00124
Petitioner:
Yohnus Adam Michael Cameron
Respondent:
Warden Angela Stuff
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Tolbert v. Smith
as 1:2025cv00107
Petitioner:
Romaine R. Tolbert
Respondent:
Warden Shelbie Smith
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
