District Court Cases in Ohio
Cases 1 - 10 of 166,226
UNITED STATES OF AMERCIA v. Carrillo
as 3:2024mc00003
Petitioner:
UNITED STATES OF AMERCIA
Respondent:
Javier H Carrillo
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 7402 IRS: Petition to Enforce IRS Summons
Miles v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv02289
Plaintiff:
Eddie Miles
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C. R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Torgerson v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv02298
Plaintiff:
Tara Torgerson
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C. R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Traynor v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv02299
Plaintiff:
Jared Traynor
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C. R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Lemere v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv02282
Plaintiff:
Linda Lemere
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C. R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Siler et al v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv02295
Plaintiff:
Lorie Jean Siler and Lawrence Daniel Siler
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C. R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Sutter v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv02296
Plaintiff:
Kristopher Sutter
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C. R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Mathews et al v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv02283
Plaintiff:
Dennis W Mathews and Sharon L Mathews
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Lerma v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv02284
Plaintiff:
Joanne Lerma
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C. R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Lunsford v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv02285
Plaintiff:
Barbara Lunsford
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C. R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
