District Court Cases in Ohio
Cases 21 - 30 of 165,604
Moses v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv01983
Plaintiff:
Eli Moses
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Adler v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv01984
Plaintiff:
Eugene Charles Adler
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Berry v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv01989
Plaintiff:
Timothy D. Berry
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Goff et al v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv01979
Plaintiff:
Richard Goff and Amber Goff
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. and Bard Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Wright v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv01980
Plaintiff:
Julius Wright
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. and Bard Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Buttram v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv01982
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey Buttram
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. and Bard Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Lloyd v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv01977
Plaintiff:
Lacey Lloyd
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Milam v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv01985
Plaintiff:
William Milam
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. and Bard Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Morton v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv01986
Plaintiff:
Mia Morton
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Johnson v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv01988
Plaintiff:
Rebecca Johnson
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. and Bard Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
