Oklahoma Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 51 - 60 of 4,813
Cramer v. Bridges
as 5:2024cv00066
Petitioner:
Peter Eugene Cramer
Respondent:
Carrie Bridges
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
SEBASTIAN v. U.S. GOVERNMENT
as 5:2024cv00055
Petitioner:
GEORGE SEBASTIAN
Respondent:
United States Government
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Johnson v. Core Civic, Inc. et al
as 6:2024cv00021
Petitioner:
Kurk Johnson
Respondent:
Core Civic, Inc., Mark Knutson, Trabel Gray and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Butler v. Day
as 6:2024cv00022
Petitioner:
Robey Lee Butler
Defendant:
Jail Administrator Jeremy Day
Respondent:
Jeremy Day
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Kolosha v. Rogers
as 5:2024cv00049
Petitioner:
Vitaly Kolosha
Respondent:
David Rogers
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (state)
Cantrell v. White
as 4:2024cv00018
Petitioner:
Christy Cantrell
Respondent:
Tamika White
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Cramer v. Bridges
as 4:2024cv00017
Petitioner:
Peter Eugene Cramer
Respondent:
Carrie Bridges
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Anderson v. Quick
as 6:2024cv00014
Petitioner:
Byron Anderson
Counter Defendant:
Christe Quick
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Jones v. Oklahoma State of
as 5:2024cv00013
Petitioner:
William D Jones
Respondent:
Oklahoma State of
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Morgan v. Biden et al
as 5:2024cv00002
Petitioner:
David Brian Morgan
Respondent:
Joe Biden, United States, Bureau of Prisons and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
